The Academy Awards in black and white and everything in between.
The disproportionate political power of Jews, which is pound for pound the greatest of any cultural group in America, is worth noting. "The Jewish economic influence and power are concentrated in Hollywood, television, and in the news industry". Jewish dominance of major Hollywood studios is no secret to anybody; Jewish screenwriters; Jewish filmmakers, comedians. Jewish and Zionist influence in the creation of "multiculturalism" and the continued Jewish attack upon Christian identity and institutions aimed to the deconstruction of the Christian-oriented status quo.
Lately though, we have been witnessing a more direct effect of the bipartisan politics on Hollywood. With the overwhelming control of the republican administration in office, we have seen an academy award celebration last year that reminded us of the republican national convention. It was as if Hollywood turned its back to the Democratic Party, which is usually the party, supported by the Jewish elite mass media intellectuals. Last year’s awards show was black, black, black... a reprimanded approach usually attempted by white America (over-compensating red states and the christian lobby ). Last year, Chris Rock rocked the house. Jamie Foxx was strutting with both Halle barry and Oprah, Kanye west was Hollywood’s golden kid, even P. Diddy was there (only very few in the audience knew who the king of Rap was). This year, we had an award show with a softer edge but bigger headlines.
As the Democratic national convention hosting city emoted to migrate from the west to the east coast (expectedly LA), the Oscars turned Jewish, gay and black. The Democratic Party has always been more sensitive, more metro-sexual and had to appeal to a larger group (being the party with no clear inclinations or decisions). As the political agenda required, the colors spanned the spectrum and the issues ranged from racism to sexism to sexuality to freedom of journalism to science. The movies reflecting internal turbulances, world famine and civil wars were substituted with those tackling issues of racial and social terrorism. The theme of the night was the impact and the role of the major films on these issues. As eloquent as usual, John Stewart tactfully steered the night with cleaver, yet polite humor. The night was completely void of surprises and a complete bore (more like the general feel in the DNC) and a trip back to cinema from the 40’s and a pre-Harlem renaissance era (my favorite part of the night was the commercial for M&Ms candies). Ludacris was there and with the music of “ it is hard out here for a pimp” some color was covered. The belles of the ball were Jessica Alba, Reese Witherspoon and Charlize Theron and UMA UMA UMA. Personally, I thought that Will Smith’s wife looked divine in her Roberto Cavalli.
Although the gay friendly atmosphere was prevalent with the Stewart/Clooney number and Luke and Owen Wilson delicate boyish looks and Ben Stiller’s leotard, the brilliant performances by Heith Ledger and Jake Jyllenhaal were marginalized. The show was racism-intensive “people are so isolated, they almost need to crash into each other in order to achieve human contact”, yet paradise now did not win and Anne Bancroft’s memorium overdid that of Mustafa Akkad.
The Democrats Lobbying Reform aimed to uncouple political agendas in the house of Senate from financial influences. Who was first, the chicken or the egg?
And who is black and Jewish America in bed with?
As much as i oppose the oil-thirsty, blood-thirsty, lobby-driven, religion-exploiting macho redneck America, i also despise the spineless, causeless, "we won't do as bad" "we appeal to everybody" pro-choice, pro-life, pro-war sometimes, pro-troops at the same time, civil right defenders, terrorist labelers, minority exploiters, flip-flopper democrats.
Some insight from a coloreful Awards show, so
Good night and good luck America..
7 comments:
I didn't understand your post. Do you actually believe there's a Jewish conspiracy to undermine the Christian way of life, or were you being sarcastic?
I thought the selected movies this year were more thoughtful than usual. Nothing too exciting, but hey, it's the Oscars. And how was the night devout of surprises? Crash winning best picture was a very big surprise.
i was not being sarcastic, and it is not a conspiracy. it's the fake interface that is played by politics and affected by society that aims to keep the public busy and the 2 parties at each other's values and intentions.
as for the actual movies, i just thought this year's selection was masked as thoughtful (more gay friendly)as a diversion. last year's big controversy was euthanasia. a pro-anti-life issue that would typically engage the 2 parties. this year the country is reflecting an anti-bush stand but is very confused towards the war and issues of terrorism. that's why all these issues are rather not be discussed or given the credit (like munich and paradise now). meanwhile, people's thirst for issues is distracted by old re-invented ones like racism
and that's why crash won
Ok it's clearer now. I think that the oscars are a reflection of where the mainstream is. The nominations and awards give an idea about the mood in the country. But it's not like there are people sitting in a dark room calling the shots.
Well no, it's just the oscars.
Hollywood is a different story.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/mar2006/osca-m08.shtml
thanks for the link jij. i enjoyed the article
Post a Comment